What are independent board advisory services for companies?
Independent board advisory services give directors and executive teams an objective perspective on cyber, AI, and technology risk. The advisor does not replace management or run operations. Instead, the work focuses on oversight: clearer reporting, decision rights, risk appetite, escalation thresholds, board education, and defensible documentation that helps directors ask better questions and guide management effectively.
How is this different from a fractional CISO or interim CISO?
A fractional or interim CISO typically manages security strategy, program execution, reporting, and operational priorities for management. Independent board advisory is focused on the board’s oversight role. Tyson Martin can validate management reporting, clarify board decisions, support committee discussions, and help directors evaluate whether the security program matches what they are being told.
What deliverables can a board advisory engagement include?
Deliverables depend on the engagement, but may include a one-page cyber risk briefing, board metrics dictionary, 90-day action plan, risk appetite statement, decision-rights matrix, AI risk register, incident disclosure playbook, tabletop after-action report, board question library, or quarterly oversight cadence. Each deliverable is designed to be board-ready and practical for management execution.
Can you help improve cyber risk reporting to the board?
Yes. Tyson Martin helps replace long technical presentations with concise, plain-English board updates that show what changed, why it matters, who owns the response, and what decisions are required. The reporting can include business impact, downtime exposure, vendor concentration, regulatory considerations, trend metrics, and exceptions so directors receive insight instead of operational noise.
Do these services support SEC cybersecurity disclosure readiness?
Yes. Advisory work can help boards and executives clarify escalation thresholds, disclosure decision processes, incident response roles, and board-level reporting expectations. For incident readiness, tabletop exercises may include rehearsal of SEC Item 1.05 timing considerations, evidence preservation, management-to-board escalation, and communication workflows so directors understand their role before a real event.
Can the advisory include AI governance oversight?
Yes. AI governance advisory helps boards understand how AI is being used, where material risks may exist, who has decision authority, and what reporting directors should receive. Deliverables may include an AI risk register, employee AI policy templates, decision-rights mapping, board-level AI oversight reporting, and a practical framework for responsible adoption.
Who is the best fit for this service?
The service is well suited for boards, audit and risk committees, CEOs, COOs, general counsel, regulated companies, digital-native businesses, and organizations in transition. It is especially valuable during M&A, leadership changes, incidents, modernization efforts, rising regulatory scrutiny, or when directors need independent validation of management’s cyber and technology risk posture.
How do engagements typically begin?
Engagements often begin with a focused conversation about board priorities, current reporting, regulatory pressure, recent incidents, business strategy, and the decisions directors need to make. From there, Tyson Martin can recommend a workshop, briefing redesign, risk appetite engagement, tabletop exercise, or ongoing board advisory cadence aligned to the company’s governance needs.